🔗 Share this article

The Life Cycle of a Movement can be defined by distinct phases.

1. The Core Concept

An inspiring figure or coaches present a new and transcendent idea pledging a solution for alienated and vulnerable people.

So here we are. Plans are in motion to challenge the establishment overseas. The gunships are circling. Signs of trouble appear from the out-houses. A lone figure, vulnerable, anxious, the words HIGH RELEASE POINT smeared across his chest as a statement, has come staggering into view and is taken aside with discretion towards an inconclusive loan stint at Derbyshire.

Do you recall the beginning, when the world was still young? The era of early Bazball, of uninhibited aggression.

2. Love-Bombing

Movement founders guarantee a reboot, hope for a future, support, salvation within a community who all believe in the big idea.

What did it represent at first? A team united enjoying success. Tattoos. Forearms. Determination. Peak performance vibes. Of course, The squad often say Bazball doesn’t actually exist, which is funny because if it doesn’t exist, what exactly did I just watch?

However, everyone understands the concept. It’s Harry Brook playing a shot so depraved it has to be pixelated. It’s the excitement of the captain in ultimate mode, an expression conveying: thoughtful warrior, beard made of wood, natural look, genuinely raw you almost imagine to glance over and notice he’s fielding in the field stripped to the waist embracing nature.

It’s Ben Duckett still being allowed to talk in press conferences, appearing as a joyful figure in a waistcoat, uttering phrases such as we are actively deconstructing the orange. Certainly, the vibe, for quite a long time, was only good energy.

3. The Growth Phase

Growth phase. Unity enforced by rote learning of the cult’s slogans. These principles can appear contradictory as a test of “true belief”.

Is it just me? The backlash, the anger, the sense of betrayal post-defeat appears excessive, too much. England batted badly during the match, as is typical there. They were dominated while bowling during a brief period as the bowling and captaincy fell apart, outplayed by Travis Head imitating their style effectively, responsive to the situation, a man playing with brilliance.

And now we have this the attacks, the anger, the view of the sport as a failure. The opinion suggests that defeat must be total, they need to lose righteously, to be scoured, obliterated, defeated via traditional methods of the bowler’s action, the conventional tactics of the veteran, marking his wickets humbly like he’s just been given a rewarding prize. What impact will this have?

4. The Backlash Phase

Problems arise due to setbacks. Yet, mistakes are denied. It turns to hatred of the outside world.

Ultimately, approaching the next match, we’ve entered a delicious point of tension in the lifespan of this movement. England could quite easily win in Brisbane through aggressive play. Alternatively, failure may follow. Should they fail it appears we may see the final stage.

Ahead of this, there are two things worth saying on the topic. Previously, during the initial excitement, of optimism and energy, I wrote an article calling it a phenomenon. Criticism followed, which demonstrated because everyone knows how to confirm something definitely isn’t a cult is should followers respond with anger rejecting criticism of the beliefs.

Recent events lately are equally notable. Criticism of the approach has now become the cult. We have a uniformly angry internet, critical analysts, shots of angry middle-aged travelling fans disappointed by the short match, like a room full of investors demanding recourse.

Conversely, there is the broader context of Australia’s more nuanced ingrained annoyance with the aggressive tourists, stating, hey, that thing you love and have developed as one way of separating yourself culturally from us, it’s not serious after all.

Here lies the truth. All movements are similar. The style was a trend because cricket is a cult. Or rather, English cricket has always been a cult, a group, a garden party, a closed world with two hundred years of tradition and mystery behind it. Historically, this was where influence is guarded. It’s the imperial sport of the British, the pioneering brand. And notably, Britain is itself a cult, a structure of hidden ranks, a place that literally still has a king.

England’s cricketers have been sealed up in this system for years. In trying to escape from it, to foster positivity, they are simply replicating their upbringing, creating another a bubble, a closed circle, but doing it this time with 15 cool guys and a coach promoting authenticity provided you conform.

Focus on the moment. Run towards the danger. Despite efforts, you remain stuck.

With this mind, it might be appropriate to have some sympathy for the approach, to acknowledge its merits, of which there are many. How to define it? Creating a sense of freedom. Defying norms. Batting aggressively|Attacking with